the blog that gets bizzy   2log
<nooze> Mark wins last week's competition! more >
Twirling Towards Freedom
Posted by Gerrit at 2007-10-15 15:07:30

I originally decided to post this picture because I thought we'd never succeed on the internet unless we posted pictures of naked women.  It turns out that this is scientific-grade porn, so I can safely post this without having to nettle Sam's moral qualms.

The test is to see which way the lady is rotating.  If you see her rotating clockwise, you're right-brained, which means you're a soap-fearin', hybrid-drivin', dashiki-worshippin', LSD-totin' hippie.  If you see her rotating counter-clockwise, then you're left-brained, which makes you a clench-reared, 401K-understandin', Nader-thankin', type A type.  Pick your side, so that we may all fight each other.

You can actually get her to switch directions if you look at her for long enough (GET A ROOM, PERV!)  I did it by focusing on her shadow.

If there's any neurologists out there, please let me know whether or not this is complete crap.  My gut feeling is that it has nothing to do with brain hemispheres, but that won't stop me from looking at it in-depth.

To discuss in the comments section: what else qualifies as scientific-grade porn?

BTB: Being from Seattle, I came out heavily right-brained


Permalink | 8 Comments | 749 points

Filed Under: porn, science
All The Small Things
Posted by Gerrit at 2008-04-21 15:04:29

My buddy Evan tips me off to his Google maps mashup of nanotechnology hotspots.  While clicking around, I found some interesting things.  One registered company, the dark blue pin in the middle of Seattle, is Nordstroms.  Why on earth is Nordstroms researching nanotechnology?  Are fashion designers planning on shrinking clothes sizes again?


Permalink | 2 Comments | 74 points

Filed Under: maps, science
Go ROB
Posted by Gerrit at 2008-09-11 09:35:08

Yesterday overshadowed some other cool geek nooze:

  • Biologists closer to building artificial life.
  • The game of Go (a game exponentially more complex than chess) has succumbed to the Turing test.  Scientists previously thought it impossible to program computers to play this difficult game with any effectiveness.  Instead, artificial intelligence has taken another step towards robo-domination of the world.

Should you be afraid?  Not necessarily.  I see a silver lining.  I'd previously mentioned that the omission of Dr. Mario from Smash Bros. Brawl was disappointing from the standpoint of a biotechnological house rule.  Fortunately, the new house rule can be adapted to the cybernetic, flesh-free paradigm, by replacing Doc with the demented R.O.B. who assimilates humans into his matrix of evil.

ALL HAIL/FEAR OUR NEW ROBO-VERLORDS!

So I was robbed today...


Permalink | 1 Comment | 28 points

Filed Under: our robot masters, video games, science
Gettin Fresh in the Depresh
Posted by Gerrit at 2009-03-12 10:56:37

 

Supposedly, only 21% of Americans think the country is on the right track.

I have a simple explanation.  It's been nine long years since Rob Thomas teamed up with Carlos Santana to drop magic in our ears.  Without conga-infused cha-cha chart-toppers, what will serve as a compass for our nation's weary hearts?

Fortunately, the nation does seem to be moving back on the right track.  That's right... Pluto is working behind closed doors to make powerful friends... the kind that can help it regain its planetary status.  Three cheers for Illinois' severe political corruption!  This calls for a Santhomas encore.


Permalink | 0 Comments | 0 points

Filed Under: sadness, smoothness, legislating science
The Millennial Postman Always Rings Twice
Posted by Gerrit at 2009-06-09 13:46:37

Comet Ikeya-Zhang, the comet with the longest known period

2log lurker Alison posits the best answer I've yet heard to my mystery of how to deliver a letter to somebody a thousand years in the future.  Shoot it into space.  Let it soar in the abyss for a millennium before falling back to earth.

This elegant solutions still raises interesting questions.  Since you can't count on having enough fuel or a functioning computer for a millennium, you don't have the privilege of making course corrections.  Essentially, you get to chuck a probe as hard as you can into the recesses of the universe and hope it falls back to terra firma.  At this distance, planet Earth looks like an awfully small bullseye... a fraction of a degree off and your letter falls into the sun.

For comparison, we look at comets, wicked portents of the night sky.  Halley's comet, easily the best-known comet, still has an orbit too complicated to be calculated exactly.  The periodic comet with the longest known period is Ikeya-Zhang, at 341 years, which puts its aphelion around the inner Oort Cloud (greatest astronomical name ever, and a decent name for a band).

I suspect the alternative, a low-earth orbit, would be too difficult to accomplish due to the problem of orbital decay.  Requiring a satellite to stay in orbit for a thousand years would require an orbit well into the earth's exosphere where it's less likely to collide with atmospheric particles.

Ultimately, I assume some rocket scientist could concoct an orbit with a decent chance of getting the message to fall back to earth.  With the error rates we're talking about, however, we can't assume we can precisely target the letter to the appropriate coordinates on Earth.  Assuming it hits the planet, about 2/3 of the time it would land in the ocean.

Despite the issues, astronomical message delivery is still about the most interesting answer I've heard to the problem yet.  Kudos!


Permalink | 4 Comments | 1,813.21 points

Filed Under: in the year 2000, sustainability, answers, questions, rocket science
Today in Racism
Posted by Gerrit at 2009-07-07 14:35:43


Permalink | 5 Comments | 4,799 points

Filed Under: racism, Tagg, religion, science
ALL OF THE TROPES!
Posted by Gerrit at 2009-07-13 21:46:22

Jetpacks securely fastened?

We're about to blast off into the TROPE-osphere.

Inspired by the latest XSDC comic (sp?), I looked up the TV Tropes website, a wiki where people identify tropes in literature, TV, movies, songs, and the like, and let you wiki surf until you wipe out your life.  I found this site last night, and woke up dead tired today.

As an example, under the trope Unusual Euphemism is included:

  • "Slippin'-rippin'-dang-fang-rotten-zarg-barg-a-ding-dong!" by Calvin's Dad (himself an example of the Deadpan Snarker and Unnamed Parent tropes)
  • "Do you see what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps" by Walter from Big Lebowski
  • "Gleesh", "snuu-snuu", and "this toads the wet sprocket" among others from Futurama.

And then you click some of those links, and then you click some of those links... and suddenly you end up in the DREAM-O-SPHERE

 


Permalink | 1 Comment | 280 points

Filed Under: memes, cunning linguistics, webberspuds, jet packs, atmospheric science
You can all calm down, SCIENCE is on the case!
Posted by Shay at 2009-08-19 14:35:38

Some Canadian scientists have finally come down from their ivory tower and decided to conduct some research we can all benefit from. An upcoming book named Infectious Disease Modelling Research Progress ( a future NY Times Bestseller by title alone) includes an article which presents a mathematical model for a possible outbreak of zombie infection. I think I speak for all of us when I say, It's about damn time!

The basic model is quite simple and can be summed up thus:

(S stands for Susceptible, Z for Zombie, and R for Removed, i.e. dead but not undead)

kind of obvious, really. If you add latent infections though, it gets a bit trickier:

 (I stands for infected)

You can read the whole paper online, it's actually quite interesting. Their scientific conclusion is that capturing or curing the zombies would only put off the inevitable and humanity's only hope for survival is to "hit them hard and hit them often." Now that's exactly the kind of conclusion you want to hear from such a study, none of that pandering to the zombophiles.

Best of all, one of the researchers is named "Professor Robert Smith?" That's right, the question mark is part of his name! I didn't know we could do that! I sense a whole new trend of punctuation marked children ("No, my name's not 'Bob', it's 'Bob!'" "That what I said, Bob." "No, Bob!" et cetera). Too bad Abbott and Costello aren't around to make use of it:


Permalink | 5 Comments | 2,835 points

Filed Under: Zombies, Science, Robert Smith?
2day's Science Lesson
Posted by DJ Flav at 2009-09-11 20:05:54

Settle down, class. You remember that crazy Mr. Azoulay from down the hall? Well, you might say he's never been shy about his love of poetry, so in honor of him I've decided to teach you 2day's science lesson in the form of limericks.

 

The Periodic Table

 

There once was an odd kind of table,
where no eating occurred. You were able
to see at a glance
which elements dance,
and which of them were and weren't stable. 

An 'H' was the first one to see,
and next came the element "He,"
a "Li" and a "Be,"
a 'B' and a 'C,'
then an 'N,' 'O,' and 'F,' and a "Ne." 

And some of the gases are noble,
while the pnictogens tend to be mobile.
Watch out for the chalcogens,
alkalis, halogens--
make a mistake: boom! Chernobyl.

There once was a metal called lead,
but no 'L' will you see there; instead,
there's a 'P' and a 'b.'
That sounds weird, but you see,
it was  "Plumbum" in languages dead.

There are 92 natural elements,
but that hasn't stopped the experiments.
They keep adding more,
so it's hard to keep score.
To list them would be anti-merriment.

I'll stop there for now, my dear students.
To blather on wouldn't be prudent.
Just copy the chart
Till you've learned it by heart.
And that's all I'll say in concludin'.


Permalink | 2 Comments | 228 points

Filed Under: back 2 school, periodic table, science, limericks
Woman Prime
Posted by Gerrit at 2010-06-09 15:53:52

What shall we name our daughters?  Science has the answer!

  • HydroJennifer
  • Botany!
  • 28
  • The Moon
  • HTMLaura
  • Protonia
  • Woman Einstein
  • AstroStar
  • Test Tube
  • Matrixie
  • Glabratory
  • XTinaBot
  • FutureMary
  • Billie "Scienceology" Jo
  • Gladys++
  • Sexponent

 


Permalink | 5 Comments | -15.8 points

Filed Under: sexism, science


What?
The next contest ends in:
2013-05-24 16:00:00 GMT-06:00
Latest 2log Stylings
October 2007
  • Twirling Towards Freedom
    April 2008
  • All The Small Things
    September 2008
  • Go ROB
    March 2009
  • Gettin Fresh in the Depresh
    June 2009
  • The Millennial Postman Always Rings Twice
    July 2009
  • Today in Racism
  • ALL OF THE TROPES!
    August 2009
  • You can all calm down, SCIENCE is on the case!

  • Scoreboard
    Gerrit 777
    Electronic cigarette kit 0
    Shay 0
    eoprorri 0
    Sam Dingman 0
    Lawyer in virginia winning viagra lawsuits 0
    DJ Flav 0
    wsugiepn 0
    Casino online casino games 0
    Debt Management Counselling 0
    Recent Comments
    The Enola Redlegs The Novel Heard 'round the World, Page 2
    anon Why I Hate Bunnies
    Redleg Vote Obamney/Ryden
    anon Why I Hate Bunnies
    Caroline Why I Hate Bunnies
    ZergKing Why I Hate Bunnies
    MacFlavCarlson Read it! Read it now!
    Nikki Why I Hate Bunnies
    lover of nature a boy of peace New Yorkers REPRESENT!
    lover of nature a girl of peace Why I Hate Bunnies
    2pal Nooze Ticker
    **Currently in Super Duper Pooper Beta**
    What's new on our friend's blogs.
    Tagg Cloud
    2uote of the Day music ao2 backstage people more famous than us video games movies cunning linguistics politics grievances video Baracknroll sam@work things that make you go "hmm" $$$ haiku movember tactics racism baseball podcasts r2s female sexuality male sexuality qotd writing musicology lynx vlog efforts
    Election 2008 Live2logs
  • Republican YouTube Debate
  • Nevada Democratic Debate
  • Super 2's-Day
  • Daily Nooze


  • The Altar of Entropy by Gerrit
    777 points for the week

    Taximan's Lament by Sam Dingman
    0 points for the week

    2 CDs by DJ Flav
    0 points for the week

    Good Question by Mark
    0 points for the week

    Lance Cashman is a Total Jerk-Off by The SWZA
    0 points for the week

    The Phil Wells by The Phil Wells
    0 points for the week

    Nerd at Play by Syd
    0 points for the week

    Pocket Full of Cereal by Dana
    0 points for the week

    2 + 2 = 5 by Winston Smith
    0 points for the week

    Reid About It by reid
    0 points for the week

    Adrift in a Sea of Cliché by Shay
    0 points for the week

    Fairly Accurate by Candice
    0 points for the week

    Search Using 2-gle